From: MPHA [mpha@mphaweb.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2006 10:11 AM
To: MPHA members
Subject: Bay State not ready for pandemic flu


Bay State not ready for pandemic flu



Take Action and Forward

"Bay State not ready for a flu epidemic."  That's the headline on the front page of today's Boston Globe (also see article below).

We understand that a pandemic flu is inevitable, and that when it occurs, it will threaten lives and challenge our communities and the economy.

Preparing for a pandemic flu is the subject of MPHA's annual meeting this Thursday (for more information or to register, visit www.mphaweb.org).  But public health concerns, including pandemic flu planning, have not been part of the debate among the candidates for governor.

Our next governor will have a major influence on the health of the people of Massachusetts.  We need to know what plans, if any, the candidates have for providing resources and leadership in preparing for pandemic flu.

Please contact the four candidates for governor and ask them what their plans are (contact information below).  Please forward any responses to MPHA.

Thank you.

Geoffrey Wilkinson
Executive Director
Massachusetts Public Health Association

Candidate Contact Information

Deval Patrick (Democrat)
Deval Patrick Committee
P.O. Box 961629
56 Roland Street, Suite 100D
Boston, MA 02196
617-367-2006
info@devalpatrick.com
www.devalpatrick.com

Grace Ross
(Green)
Friends of Grace Ross 4 Governor
2 Merrick Street
Worcester, MA 01609
508-754-3505
grace4gov@green-rainbow.org
www.graceandmartina.org 

Christy Mihos  (Independent)
Christy 2006 Committee
9 Park Street
Boston, MA 02108
617-399-2244
www.christy2006.com
(email form available on web site)

Kerry Healey (Republican)

Healey Committee

85 Merrimac Street

Boston, MA 02114

617-523-0844

www.healeycommittee.com

(email form available on web site)

Bay State not ready for a flu epidemic

$36.5m Romney plan shelved by Legislature

Eight months after Governor Mitt Romney asked legislators to spend $36.5 million to rapidly prepare the state for an influenza epidemic, not a single additional hospital bed, breathing machine, or bottle of medicine has been purchased.

The governor's request is languishing on Beacon Hill, even as public health specialists, Democratic lawmakers, and Romney's aides warn that the failure to act could leave the state vulnerable if a particularly bad flu season strikes. The House Ways and Means Committee is reviewing the plan but has no timetable for finalizing it.

``It's frustrating to see how ineffective political relationships stall action on important public health policy like this," said Geoffrey Wilkinson, executive director of the Massachusetts Public Health Association. ``It's very important to get resources into the hands of local health officials."

On the best days, Massachusetts hospitals have barely enough beds and ventilators to handle the regular patient load, and they would be staggered by an onslaught of wheezing, feverish flu patients in an epidemic, specialists said.

The proposal from Romney and the Department of Public Health calls for purchasing 5,000 sophisticated medical cots for overflow patients, 2,000 ventilators to sustain their breathing, and medication to treat and prevent the flu in 44,000 people.

``No matter how aggressively hospitals use their existing bed capacity, the state's not going to have enough ventilators, enough bed space," said Dr. Paul Biddinger , associate director of the Harvard School of Public Health's Center for Public Health Preparedness .

And it will be too late to buy that equipment once an epidemic begins spreading, specialists said.

``There are some things that have to be done ahead of time," said Dr. David Ozonoff , an environmental health specialist at the Boston University School of Public Health . ``Making sure there are enough ventilators, that's something you've got to do in advance because when the time comes, everybody's going to want more ventilators."

Disease specialists warn that a global flu epidemic akin to the cataclysmic 1918 outbreak -- which killed about 50 million people worldwide -- could inflict difficult-to-treat respiratory infections on 90 million Americans. And the crisis, known as a pandemic, would be especially acute in Massachusetts because of the lack of excess capacity. Even a bad flu season, short of a pandemic, could paralyze the region's healthcare system.

So, in February, Romney stood before hundreds of federal, state, and local health officials at a flu summit and delivered his plan to prepare the state for a pandemic.

Almost from the minute the governor's proposal was unveiled, it met with hostility from the Legislature's leading voices on health issues.

The reaction is ``cause for great concern, and the lack of action by the Legislature is discouraging," said Eric Fehrnstrom , the governor's chief spokesman. ``To do nothing exposes the people of Massachusetts to a disease outbreak, and that's inexcusable."

State Senator Richard T. Moore , chairman of the Joint Committee on Health Care Financing, said it was not the Legislature's fault, but Romney's plan, which he said was sparse on details. For instance, the Uxbridge Democrat said, it included no provision for where millions of dollars' worth of emergency medical equipment would be stored.

``If we should have a pandemic or even a serious flu season, the governor's response is going to be, `The Legislature didn't act on this,' " Moore said, ``so it puts us in a bad light.

``But their request wasn't going to help us do anything meaningful," he said. ``It would have helped the governor's position to say he tried to do something, and that's about all it would have done."

The chief of staff for the House Ways and Means Committee, James Eisenberg , said that legislators decided the proposal should be broadened to address an array of health crises . The House added a number of provisions, including one on the quarantining of potentially infectious patients.

The measure is ``something that is on our proverbial radar screen," Eisenberg said. ``But it doesn't make sense to address this piecemeal."

As a result of the Legislature's delay, officials in Romney's Department of Public Health grew frustrated and their interest in the measure waned, said Lowell health department director Frank Singleton , a strident champion of flu preparations.

``The problem is the state health department was sulking about the major revision of the bill," Singleton said. ``They actually weren't pushing it for a while."

Administrators at the Department of Public Health referred all questions about the flu epidemic plans to the governor's office.

In an e-mail, Fehrnstrom emphatically denied that the Romney administration's interest in the issue had ever wavered. He cited a series of meetings the state's public health commissioner, Paul J. Cote Jr., conducted with legislators, as well as written communications the commissioner had with members of the House.

State Representative Peter J. Koutoujian , chairman of the House Committee on Public Health , said that he is now looking to narrow the proposal so that the most urgent needs can be met.

But approval won't come soon enough to buy supplies for this year's flu season, which begins in about a month. However, last year's flu season began slowly, reaching its peak in March, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention , which will begin tracking flu cases nationwide in two weeks.

``Further delay isn't going to make the situation any better," said Paul Wingle , spokesman for the Massachusetts Hospital Association . ``We need to prepare to the best of our ability for a very bad scenario. We'll pray that that scenario never comes to pass ."

Stephen Smith can be reached at stsmith@globe.com.  


 



To manage your preferences or unsubscribe, please click here.